Skip to content
Projet 816wiki
Contents

Where the project stands

Project 816 is just starting: its specification is written, nothing has yet been drawn, coded or built. Here is what comes next, in the planned order.

Today

ItemStatus
Specificationwritten
System controllerGW1NR-9 FPGA soldered on the board; 42 pins at 3.3 V out of 45 (margin of 3) and the audio codec at 1.8 V
Memory16 MB of QSPI PSRAM, chosen on 15 October 2026; effective speed of about 4 MHz estimated, to be measured
Register map (docs/registers.md)version 0.1 proposed, to be validated
FPGA Verilognot started
Pico firmwarenot started
Schematics and boardsnot started
65816 softwarenot started

The project is in Phase 1: preparing the validation board.

The tasks, in order

  1. ✅ Check the actual pinout of the Tang Nano 9K: done on 15 October 2026; the module does not have enough pins.
  2. ✅ Choose a solution: the Tang Nano 9K’s FPGA is soldered directly on the board (see The processor and the bus).
  3. ✅ Check the bank voltages in Gowin’s documentation: bank 3 is fixed at 1.8 V, and the need for 47 pins does not fit all at 3.3 V.
  4. ✅ Validate the audio codec at 1.8 V on bank 3: chosen on 15 October 2026 (8 pins).
  5. ✅ Choose a JTAG probe compatible with 1.8 V: the Tigard is chosen (Digilent JTAG-HS2 as an alternative), with a 1 × 8 connector on the board.
  6. ✅ Write the register map: version 0.1, proposed on 15 October 2026 (The register map); still to be validated.
  7. ✅ Measure the access mix of a real 65816 program: done on the OricOS kernel, under emulation.
  8. Measure the QSPI frequency sustained, with a PSRAM wired to the Tang Nano 20K at hand, then check the 9K’s chip with a timing analysis.
  9. Write the 9K Verilog: clock and PHI2 (with its clock stretching), bank latching, decoding, QSPI PSRAM controller with a PSRAM simulation model, start-up handling, each with its testbench.
  10. Draw the validation board schematic: processor, PSRAM, 9K FPGA and its power supplies, JTAG, headers, and access for a logic analyser.
  11. Route the validation board in 2 layers, with a check against the manufacturer’s rules (JLCPCB).
  12. Write a minimal Pico firmware: loading the boot code into PSRAM (through the 9K), serial console.
  13. Write a 65816 test program: a test of the whole 16 MB of memory.
  14. Only after validation: the schematic and routing of the Mini-ITX board.

The points still open

The specification refuses to guess. These points are marked as to be checked or to be decided:

  • the register map v0.1, to be validated (sound cores, boot loading by the Pico, video modes);
  • the QSPI link frequency the 9K will reach, and so the processor’s effective speed (to be measured on the Tang Nano 20K, then by timing analysis for the 9K’s chip);
  • a PSRAM constraint (tCEM, maximum duration of a selection) to be checked on its data sheet;
  • using the FPGA’s pins 53 and 54 as inputs/outputs;
  • routing the QFN88 package (0.4 mm pitch) on a 2-layer board, not checked;
  • the FPGA’s stock at LCSC (168 parts on 15 October 2026);
  • the position of the expansion slot on the Mini-ITX board, and the exact dimensions, to be checked against an official template;
  • the pin numbers of the processor in the PLCC44 package (same signals as in DIP40);
  • the choice of sound cores: FM, PSG, SID or POKEY;
  • the detailed register map of each block;
  • the availability at LCSC of the FE2.1 USB hub and the TLV320AIC3254 codec.

This wiki follows the specification: it will be updated as these points are settled.

Sources in the repository : docs/SPEC.md, README.md.